Feeds on a diet or diet of feeds?

I had to giggle when I opened Google Reader and like Scritty found Fiona Bradley's post on librariesinteract.info entitled How to: Put your feeds on a diet. What amused me so much wasn't the feeds she suggested should be cut shamelessly but more the feeds she suggested keeping:

• Blogs with few subscribers - because you won’t be rereading their comments on everyone else’s blog

(okay, so there's hope for my blog and the wiki for the Stapler Liberation Front yet!)

• Analytical, thoughtful blogs - they’re worth the time

(Flybrarian, this means your blog is OK?)

• Blogs outside librarianship, or with a higher ratio of original content

(yay! I can keep reading those strange news items from the ABC News Offbeat feeds - like the one about the guy who rolled his car inside the KFC drive through)

• Feeds you actually read, if you use Google Reader use the statistics feature to work out which you read the most

(this would limit my feeds to precisely... 3)

I guess ultimately putting my feeds on a diet is better than a diet of feeds